Author Archives: admin

December 10, 2024

New Rule Permanently Extends the Automatic EAD Extension Period to 540 Days

Samantha Wolfe

Samantha Wolfe

By Samantha Wolfe

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is finalizing a critical regulatory change to permanently increase the automatic extension period for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) from 180 days to 540 days for certain eligible renewal applicants. Scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on December 13, 2024, this rule represents a significant shift in employment authorization policy aimed at mitigating the risks associated with USCIS processing delays.

This change builds on temporary rules issued in 2022 and 2024, which successfully alleviated employment disruptions for thousands of workers and their employers. Here’s what we know so far, based on the unpublished version of the rule. Read more >>

December 6, 2024

Revised Exchange Visitor Skills List: A Game-Changer for J-1 Visa Holders from China, India, and Beyond

By Samantha Wolfe

Samantha Wolfe

Samantha Wolfe

The U.S. Department of State has announced a major update to the Exchange Visitor Skills List, effective December 9, 2024. This is the first significant revision in 15 years and removes the two-year home-residency requirement for J-1 visa holders from 34 countries, including China, India, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. These changes have profound implications for individuals, employers, and U.S. innovation.

What Is the Skills List?

The Exchange Visitor Skills List identifies countries and fields of expertise deemed essential for a country’s development. Nationals of these countries who hold J-1 visas have historically been required to return home for at least two years after completing their programs. The revised list eliminates this requirement for 34 nations, marking a significant policy shift toward talent retention in the U.S. Read more >>

November 19, 2024

Federal Court Strikes Down DOL’s 2024 Overtime Rule

Adam Bouka

By Adam Bouka and Brit Merrill

On November 15, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas invalidated the Department of Labor’s (DOL) 2024 Final Rule, which increased salary thresholds for overtime exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This decision in State of Texas v. Dep’t of Labor, Case No. 24-cv-468-SDJ, vacates the rule nationwide, halting its implementation and restoring the salary level in effect prior to July 1, 2024 ($35,586 per year, $684 per week) for executive, administrative, and professional (EAP) exemptions and ($107,432 per year) for the highly compensated employee exemption.

Brit Merrill

Key Takeaways:

  • Executive, Administrative, and Professional (EAP) Exemptions
    • The planned salary threshold increase to $844 per week (or $43,888 annually), effective July 1, 2024, is no longer valid.
    • Future staged increases, including the January 1, 2025 threshold of $1,218 per week and automatic updates starting July 1, 2027, are also void.
    • Employers must revert to the prior salary threshold of $684 per week ($35,568 annually) for EAP exemptions.
  • Highly Compensated Employee Exemption
    • The planned salary threshold increase to $132,964 effective July 1, 2024 is no longer valid.
    • Future staged increases, including the January 1, 2025 threshold increase to $151,164, is now void.
    • Employers must revert to the prior salary threshold of $107,432 per year for highly compensated employee exemptions.

Read more >>

November 18, 2024

Bracing for Impact: What Employers Need to Know About Homeland Security Investigations’ Worksite Enforcement Plans

Chris Thomas

By Chris Thomas

Our team recently engaged in discussions with both current and former officials at Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the workplace enforcement arm of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In these discussions, beyond learning about the widely publicized plans to declare a state of emergency and to involve the military and national guard in worksite enforcement deportation and worksite enforcement activity, we gained insights into a few of the government’s lesser-known plans.  Read more >>

Passports and Visa

November 6, 2024

Navigating Immigration Changes in 2025: What Businesses Need to Know Following the 2024 Election

By Samantha Wolfe

Samantha Wolfe

Samantha Wolfe

As the dust settles from the 2024 US presidential election, businesses with a significant international workforce are bracing for potential shifts in immigration policy. Former President Donald J. Trump’s return to office signals a likely shift towards more restrictive immigration measures, similar to his first administration’s policies and perhaps more expansive. With immigration playing a central role in his campaign, organizations with foreign national employees, global mobility programs, and compliance needs are advised to prepare for a potentially transformed immigration landscape.

Here are some key areas where we anticipate changes and what businesses should be aware of as we move into 2025.

1. Heightened Enforcement and Security-Based Policies

A renewed focus on immigration enforcement is expected, with a security-driven approach that may involve stricter compliance requirements and enhanced scrutiny of visa applications. Trump’s campaign promises suggest increased workplace inspections, audits, and enforcement actions from agencies such as US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

For companies, this could mean heightened audits and the need for robust compliance protocols. Businesses should consider proactively reviewing their I-9 and E-Verify processes, conducting internal audits, and ensuring that their immigration practices align with federal regulations to mitigate any potential risks.

Read more >>

October 28, 2024

Current Issues in Fall 2024 for PERM Labor Certifications: What Employers Need to Know

Samantha Wolfe

Samantha Wolfe

By Samantha Wolfe

As we move through Fall 2024, employers navigating the PERM labor certification process face a range of challenges. The process—essential for sponsoring foreign workers for permanent residency—has become more complex due to funding shortfalls at the Department of Labor’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC), increased scrutiny of applications, and longer processing times. If your company sponsors employees for green cards, understanding these issues is crucial to avoid delays and ensure compliance.

Here’s what you need to know and how to manage the most pressing PERM issues facing employers today.

1. OFLC Funding Shortages Are Causing Lengthy Delays

The OFLC, responsible for processing PERM labor certifications, is dealing with budget constraints that have led to significant delays. This means that key parts of the process, like prevailing wage determinations and application reviews, are taking much longer than before.

What this means for your company:

  • Start early: Begin the labor certification process as soon as possible. These delays can stretch timelines by months, so it’s essential to factor in extra time.
  • Stay on top of deadlines: Keep a close eye on all deadlines and ensure your HR team understands the timeline for recruitment and filings.

Read more >>

October 15, 2024

EEOC Steps Up Enforcement for Pregnant Workers: What Businesses Need to Know About the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

Leslie Perkins

by Leslie Perkins and Greg Saylin

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency tasked with enforcing anti-discrimination laws, has been increasingly active in addressing compliance with regulations affecting pregnant workers. This has been particularly evident in fiscal year 2024, as the EEOC has already filed five cases under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), despite the law being in effect for just over a year. State labor commissions, such as the Utah Antidiscrimination and Labor Division, have likewise seen an increase in charges by pregnant workers.

Greg Saylin

Passed in 2023, the federal PWFA was introduced to combat discrimination and promote workplace equality by requiring employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees and applicants with known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Retaliation against such workers is prohibited.

Some employers have been caught off guard since pregnancy-related leave, without extenuating medical complications, has largely been a function of company parental leave policies, particularly where a worker has not been employed long enough to qualify for other leave. Employers need to take note that they are now required to engage in the interactive process to determine whether an employee is entitled to an accommodation for a pregnancy-related condition – even those not associated with complications – such as normal childbirth and recovery time.   Read more >>

August 21, 2024

The FTC’s Noncompete Ban Is Dead—For Now

Steven Eheart

By Steven Eheart and Mark Wiletsky

Employers finally have the answer they’ve been waiting for: they don’t need to comply with the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) Rule banning noncompete agreements—for now.

The FTC’s Rule was set to go into effect on September 4, 2024. But, on August 20, 2024, a federal judge from the Northern District of Texas set aside the Rule and barred the FTC from enforcing it. The same judge previously put the Rule on hold as to only the parties who brought the lawsuit, but this new decision applies to all employers.

Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

The Court rejected the Rule for two reasons: 1) the Rule exceeded the FTC’s statutory authority, and 2) the Rule is arbitrary and capricious.

The Court found that the plain language of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) does not expressly give the FTC authority to create substantive rules regarding unfair methods of competition. Additionally, the Court found that even if the FTCA empowers the FTC to create some rules, it only empowers rulemaking related to unfair or deceptive acts or practices—and noncompete agreements are not unfair or deceptive practices. In the end, the Court stated that the “role of an administrative agency is to do as told by Congress, not to do what the agency thinks it should do.” Read more >>

August 7, 2024

A Path Towards Legal Permanent Residency: Applications Open on August 19, 2024 for New DHS Family Unity Program

By Sarah Bileti, Ann Lee, and Chris Thomas

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the White House recently unveiled a new initiative that promises to transform the lives of undocumented noncitizen spouses of U.S. citizens. Scheduled to start taking applications on August 19, 2024, this groundbreaking program will provide a legal pathway to permanent residence (e.g., Green Card) for eligible individuals residing in the U.S. for over a decade without formal admission or parole.  Initial reports estimate that approximately 500,000 noncitizen spouses of U.S. citizens and 50,000 noncitizen children of these spouses could benefit, marking this initiative as a major step forward in the U.S.’ commitment to family unity and fairness in its immigration policies. Read more >>

July 31, 2024

Second Decision on FTC’s Noncompete Ban Is In

Annie Stuller

Annie Stuller

By Annie Stuller

On July 23, 2024, a federal judge from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania declined to issue a preliminary injunction that would block the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) rule banning most noncompete agreements, current and future, that is set to take effect on September 4 (“Rule”).

In reaching this decision, the judge concluded that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. First, the judge rejected the plaintiff’s argument that Section 6(g) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act” or “Act”) only authorizes procedural rulemaking, explaining it “is inherently inconsistent and therefore untenable” to read the word “procedural” but not “substantive” into the FTC Act when neither word appears within the Act. She explained, “it [is] clear that the FTC is empowered to make both procedural and substantive rules as is necessary to prevent unfair methods of competition.” Second, unpersuaded by the plaintiff’s supporting reasons, the judge rejected the plaintiff’s alternative argument that—even if the FTC Act empowers the FTC with authority to make substantive rules—the FTC exceeded its authority by banning all noncompete agreements. Read more >>