Category Archives: Colorado

October 22, 2024

In Colorado, Holiday Incentive Pay Must Be Included When Calculating the Regular Rate of Pay

Steven Eheart

By Steven Eheart

On January 12, 2024, the federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals asked the Colorado Supreme Court to clarify whether, under Colorado law, holiday incentive pay must be included when calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay. On September 9, 2024, the Colorado Supreme Court responded: yes, it must be included.

The Regular Rate of Pay

Employees who work more than forty hours per week must receive overtime pay at a rate that is 1.5 times their regular rate of pay. Some states also have daily overtime requirements; for example, in Colorado, employees who work more than 12 hours per workday or 12 consecutive hours must also receive overtime pay at 1.5 times their regular rate of pay.

Importantly, the regular rate of pay is not the same as the base hourly rate. The regular rate of pay is a calculation that incorporates non-overtime compensation received for work performed during a workweek. Read more >>

September 25, 2024

Demystifying Qualifications for PWFA

Dana Dobbins

By Dana Dobbins

Question: Do employees have to be employed for 12 months or work 1,250 hours to qualify for the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), or do they qualify as soon as they begin employment?

Answer: No, employees do not need to be employed for 12 months or work a minimum threshold of hours before they can qualify for protections and accommodations under the federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) or the Colorado PWFA. Employees qualify immediately (provided that the employer is a covered entity). In fact, by its terms, the PWFA applies even to job applicants. This is also true for Colorado’s PWFA.1

Under the PWFA, employers must make reasonable accommodations for the known limitations of an employee or applicant, unless the accommodation would cause an “undue hardship”—i.e., significant difficulty or expense. Read more >>

August 26, 2024

Preventing Double-Dipping: Ensure that Paid Parental Leave Runs Concurrently with FAMLI Leave and FMLA

Dana Dobbins

By Dana Dobbins

In Colorado, beginning on January 1, 2024, eligible employees can take paid leave for a variety of circumstances under Colorado’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program. Given that the FAMLI program is still in its infancy, there are several ambiguities and issues that still need to be resolved, and employers are still adjusting their policies.

One of the pitfalls facing employers is that they have not updated employment handbooks or policies to clarify that any paid parental leave otherwise offered under company policy runs concurrently with FAMLI leave (in addition to running concurrently with FMLA leave), not in addition to those leaves. Failing to update those policies may leave the employer in a situation where an employee can take 24 or more weeks of leave, and there is little the employer can do to prevent it without running afoul of the law. For most employers, this extended duration of leave is simply not feasible. Thus, updating relevant handbook or policy provisions is key. Read more >>

June 8, 2023

Shifting Landscape: New Laws Significantly Impact Colorado Employers

Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

by Mark Wiletsky and Joshua Kohler

During this legislative session, Colorado enacted more protections for employees in the workplace, including redefining what constitutes unlawful harassment, restricting confidentiality agreements, expanding the ability to use paid sick leave, and addressing job posting requirements.

Governor Polis signed into law the Protecting Opportunities and Workers’ Rights (POWR) Act (SB23-172), Additional Uses of Paid Sick Leave (SB23-017), and the Ensure Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (SB23-105). POWR and Additional Uses of Paid Sick Leave go into effect August 7, 2023 and Ensure Equal Pay for Equal Work Act goes into effect January 1, 2024.  These laws, and POWR in particular, make considerable changes to the obligations and requirements of employers in Colorado. Now is a good time to revisit any form agreements used with current or prospective employees (e.g., settlement agreements, employment agreements, etc.) and employee handbooks, update anti-harassment and complaint procedures and plan for anti-harassment training, and assess your internal job posting process.

Read more >>

December 5, 2022

Can An Employee Be Required to Sign a Noncompete Agreement Before They Receive Their Final Paycheck?

Juan Obregon

By Juan Obregon

Question: Can we require an employee to sign a noncompete agreement before they receive their final paycheck?

Answer: In short: no, employers cannot withhold an employee’s final paycheck until they sign a non-compete. Doing so likely violates Colorado’s restrictive covenant statute (Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-2-113) and the Colorado Wage Claim Act (Colo. Rev. Stat. 8-4-101, et seq).

Under Section 8-4-109 of the Colorado Wage Claim Act, when the employer terminates an employee, “wages or compensation for labor or service earned, vested, determinable, and unpaid at the time of such discharge is due and payable immediately.” When an employee quits “the wages or compensation shall become due and payable upon the next regular payday.” Either way, if the employee performed the labor to earn those wages, they are due and failing to pay it timely could subject the employer to significant penalties. Read more >>

December 1, 2022

New Guidance on Bonuses and Commissions May Cause Headaches for Employers

Juan Obregon

By Juan Obregon

Organizations commonly require employees to be employed on the date a commission or bonus is paid to receive the commission or bonus. The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE), which interprets and administers Colorado’s Wage Act, recently indicated that practice is not permissible, which means employers will need to revisit their bonus agreements and commission plans sooner rather than later. The failure to heed the CDLE’s guidance may result in costly wage claims. 

Overview

The Colorado Wage Act requires employers to pay employees the wages and other compensation they earn. Non-discretionary bonuses and commissions are considered wages. Under the Colorado Wage Act, an employee is not entitled to wages or compensation unless such amounts are “earned, vested, and determinable.” The question, of course, is: when are bonuses or commissions earned, vested, and determinable? Read more >>

May 2, 2022

CDLE Issues New Guidance on Vacation, PTO, and Payroll Deductions

By Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) recently provided guidance for Colorado employers on two important issues: payment of vacation and paid time off (PTO) to employees upon separation from employment, and deductions from pay.  While these documents are not binding, they represent the CDLEs interpretation of Colorado law and therefore provide helpful guidance to employers.

Vacation, PTO, Floating Holidays, and More.  In Nieto v. Clark’s Market, Inc., 2021 CO 48, the Colorado Supreme Court held that employers must pay employees all accrued but unused vacation pay upon separation from employment.  Unfortunately, that decision left open some questions for employers, which CDLE addresses in INFO #14, including:

  • What counts as vacation pay? Basically, any leave that can be used at the employee’s discretion, such as paid time off (PTO), annual leave, personal days, floating holidays, etc.  The CDLE explains that “vacation pay” includes any paid leave for which there is no qualifying event.  Leave that is based on a qualifying event, such as health needs, a designated public holiday, caretaking, or bereavement, is not considered vacation pay.
  • Does that mean PTO, annual days, etc. must be paid upon separation from employment? Yes, according to the CDLE.  If the paid leave can be used without a qualifying event, then any accrued but unused paid time off must be paid upon separation from employment.
  • What about a “floating holiday” that can be used for any holiday the employee celebrates? That is not vacation pay, according to the CDLE, because it is tied to a specific qualifying event, e., a holiday the employee celebrates.  However a “floating holiday” that can be used completely at the employee’s discretion is vacation pay.
  • If we do not have a written policy, do we still have to pay accrued but unused vacation upon separation? Yes, if you have a practice of providing vacation or paid time off, it does not matter whether the policy is written.
  • What about “unlimited vacation” – do we need to pay anything upon separation? No, but the CDLE notes that if the company caps the time off or otherwise does not allow for “unlimited” vacation, then you likely would have to pay any unused vacation upon separation.
  • Are use-it-or-lose-it policies permissible? No, according to the CDLE.  Once employees earn vacation pay (regardless of the name used for such pay), they cannot forfeit such pay.  Capping the amount of earned vacation or PTO that rolls over from year to year would amount to a forfeiture.  The Colorado Supreme Court did not address this question in Nieto, but the CDLE’s guidance appears to be consistent with the reasoning in Nieto.
  • Can we cap the amount of vacation pay employees earn? Employers may set a maximum cap at which accrual stops, until such time as the employee falls below that cap.

Read more >>

August 4, 2021

Denver’s New Vaccine Mandate For Some Private-Sector Employers: Are you prepared?

by Laurie Rogers

Laurie Rogers

Colorado employers already grappling with mandatory paid sick leave and complex job posting requirements may now be obligated to implement mandatory vaccination policies for their employees.

On Monday, August 2, 2021, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock announced a mandatory vaccination requirement for the City’s 10,000-plus workers and certain private-sector workers in high-risk settings. Denver is the first major U.S. city to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for private-sector employees. The City’s Department of Public Health & Environment (“DDPHE”) claims that, as the accredited public health agency for the City and County of Denver, it has the authority to mandate vaccinations to protect the public from immediate and imminent risk to its health and safety. See City of Denver FAQs.

Read more >>

June 25, 2021

Pay Up: Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Vacation Payout Obligations

By Steve Gutierrez

Steven Gutierrez

Colorado law has long been unsettled as to whether employers must pay out accrued but unused vacation time at separation of employment where the employer’s vacation policy recites that vacation time need not be paid out at separation (e.g., because certain conditions, like voluntary separation, or the employee’s provision of two weeks’ notice, are not satisfied). But no longer. The Colorado Supreme Court decided a case on June 14, 2021, addressing this issue head-on, and held that “all earned and determinable vacation pay must be paid upon separation and that any agreement purporting to forfeit earned vacation is void.” The Supreme Court’s decision also appears to invalidate “use-it-or-lose-it” vacation policies in Colorado going forward.

Background on Nieto v. Clark’s Market

The Supreme Court’s decision arose from the case of Nieto v. Clark’s Market, in which an employer declined to pay an employee’s accrued but unused vacation time at separation of employment because the employee had been discharged, and the employer’s vacation policy provided that, “[i]f you are discharged for any reason or do not give proper notice, you will forfeit all earned vacation pay benefits.” The employer argued that the terms of this vacation policy controlled whether accrued but unused vacation time must be paid out at separation of employment, and the employee argued that, under the Colorado Wage Claim Act (“CWCA”), vacation time which is earned and determinable must always be paid out at separation – regardless of what the employer’s vacation policy says about such payout. Read more >>

June 17, 2021

10th Circuit Decision May Affect Work-From-Home Requests After Pandemic Ends

by Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

Mark Wiletsky

As COVID-19 vaccinations increase and states ease pandemic-related restrictions, many employers are beginning to plan for employees’ to return to the office. But not all workers may want to return, and some might ask to work remotely because of ongoing concerns about the virus in light of underlying health conditions or simply a fear of becoming infected. It remains to be seen how courts will address the issues under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state law, but the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Colorado employers) recently provided useful guidance in a case addressing a prepandemic accommodation issue.

Facts

Joan Unrein worked at the Colorado Plains Medical Center as a clinical dietitian. At some point, she became legally blind. The hospital accommodated her blindness at work with special magnifying equipment, but her transportation issues were more problematic.

Unrein, who lived about 60 miles from the hospital, couldn’t drive herself to work or secure a ride service or public transportation, so she had to rely on friends and family. As a result, her ability to get to and from work was inconsistent, leading her to request a flexible schedule. Read more >>